The financing decision matters as much as the equipment
decision, and it is made faster and with less information. The
single question underneath all four options is whether you end up owning
the system. Ownership decides who claims the incentives, who carries the
maintenance, and how difficult the house is to sell.
The four options
The question underneath all four is whether you end up owning the system.
Ownership decides who claims any incentive, who carries maintenance, and
how straightforward the house is to sell. The table summarises that; the
cards below it give the detail.
Solar financing compared, by who ends up owning the system | Option | Who owns it | Upfront cost | Who claims an incentive | Payment escalates | Selling the house |
| Cash | You, from day one | Highest | You, if any applies | No | Transfers with the house |
| Loan | You, subject to the lender’s claim | Low or none | You, if any applies | No, but interest and a dealer fee apply | Repay, or the buyer assumes it; any UCC-1 must be cleared or subordinated |
| Lease | A third party | Low or none | The third-party owner | Commonly, annually | The buyer must qualify and assume it, or you buy it out |
| Power purchase agreement | A third party | Low or none | The third-party owner | Commonly, annually | The buyer assumes it, or it is settled at closing |
Cash
You own it outright from day one.
- In its favour
- Lowest total cost. No interest, no dealer fee, no lien, no third party in the transaction. Simplest thing to sell a house with.
- Against it
- Largest upfront outlay, and the capital is tied up in the roof.
- When you sell
- Transfers with the house. Nothing to settle.
Loan
You own it. The lender has a claim until it is repaid.
- In its favour
- Ownership without the upfront cost, and you keep any incentive that attaches to the owner.
- Against it
- Interest, and frequently a dealer fee built into the principal that is not shown separately. The advertised rate is not the rate you are paying.
- When you sell
- Pay it off, or the buyer assumes it. A UCC-1 filing against the equipment has to be cleared or subordinated at closing.
Lease
A third party owns the equipment. You rent it.
- In its favour
- Little or nothing upfront, and maintenance is typically the owner’s problem.
- Against it
- You do not own the asset and do not claim the owner’s incentives. Many leases escalate the payment annually, which can outrun the utility inflation the deal was sold against.
- When you sell
- The buyer must qualify and assume the lease, or you buy it out. This is a live negotiation, not a formality.
Power purchase agreement
A third party owns the system. You buy the electricity it makes.
- In its favour
- Little or nothing upfront. You pay per kilowatt-hour rather than a fixed rent, so a poor production year costs you less.
- Against it
- Same ownership position as a lease, and the rate usually escalates. Compare the escalated rate in year fifteen against what you pay the utility today.
- When you sell
- Same as a lease — the buyer assumes it or it is settled at closing.
The dealer fee, which is where the money is
The dealer fee is the most consequential number in a financed solar deal
and the least disclosed.
On a financed system, the installer commonly pays the lender a fee so that a
below-market interest rate can be offered. That fee is recovered by raising
the price of the system, and it is financed along with everything else. So a
quote advertising a very low rate may carry a cash price materially above
what the same system costs paid outright.
The test is simple: ask for the cash price and the financed price as
two separate numbers. If they differ, the gap is the fee. Our
dealer fee calculator solves for
the rate you are actually paying against the true cash price, and
what "zero down" really means covers the
pattern.
Escalators, and the assumption underneath them
Most leases and PPAs raise your payment by a fixed percentage every year,
often for twenty years or more.
The pitch is that utility rates rise faster, so you stay ahead. That may
hold. It may not — and a contract with a fixed escalator has no mechanism
for the case where it does not. Run the rate out to year fifteen and twenty
and compare it against what you pay your utility today, rather than against
a projection supplied by the company selling it.
The escalator calculator does
that, and lease vs buy compares the two
paths over the full term.
Liens, and why they surface at closing
Many solar loans are secured against the equipment with a UCC-1 financing
statement. That is normal and not sinister, but it appears in a title search
and a buyer's lender will want it resolved.
It is not a problem if you know about it months before you list, and it is
an expensive scramble if you discover it a week before closing.
UCC-1 liens on solar loans and
selling with a loan or
lease set out what has to be cleared.
Financing changes who gets the incentives
Incentives that attach to the owner of the equipment go to whoever owns it.
Under a lease or a PPA, that is the third party rather than you.
This matters more now than it used to. Section 25D, the residential federal
credit, was terminated for expenditures made after 31 December 2025, while
the business credit behind third-party-owned systems runs on a different
timetable. Why a lease still gets a
credit and you do not explains the split, and
solar incentives covers all four layers.
What to ask before signing anything
- What is the cash price, and what is the financed price? If they differ, what is the difference for?
- What is the dealer fee, as a dollar figure?
- Is there an escalator, and what does the payment become in year twenty?
- Will a lien be filed against the equipment or the property?
- Who owns the system, and who claims any incentive?
- What happens if I sell in year seven — exactly what must the buyer do?
- What are the early buyout terms, and how is the buyout price calculated?
Common questions
What is a solar dealer fee?
A fee paid to the lender by the installer to offer a below-market interest rate, recovered by raising the cash price of the system. It is built into the amount financed and is rarely shown as its own line. The headline rate looks attractive; the effective rate against the true cash price is higher.
Is it better to buy or lease solar?
It depends on whether you can use the incentives that attach to ownership and on how long you plan to stay. Ownership carries the better long-run economics for most households who can use the benefits; a lease or PPA moves the upfront cost and the maintenance obligation to someone else, at the price of not owning the asset.
What is an escalator clause?
A term that raises your lease payment or PPA rate by a fixed percentage every year, commonly for twenty years or more. It is sold on the assumption that utility rates will rise faster. Model what the rate becomes in year fifteen and twenty before signing, because that assumption may not hold.
Can I sell my house with solar?
Yes, but the financing structure determines how easily. An owned system transfers with the house. A loan with a UCC-1 filing, a lease or a PPA each have to be paid off, subordinated or assumed by the buyer before closing, and any of those can complicate a sale.
Does financing affect which incentives I get?
Substantially. Incentives that attach to the owner of the equipment go to the third party under a lease or PPA, not to you. Whether any of that value is reflected in your rate depends entirely on the terms you sign.
HyreSolar does not finance solar systems, originate loans, or broker leases or
power purchase agreements, and nothing here is financial or tax advice.
Terms vary by lender, by state and by individual circumstances. Confirm
anything you intend to rely on with a qualified professional before signing.